Mapping the Methodological Quality of International Primary-Secondary Transitions Research Literature: A Systematic Methodological Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5334/ijelt.74Keywords:
Primary-secondary transitions, mapping, methodology, congruenceAbstract
This is the first systematic methodological review undertaken of international primary-secondary transitions empirical research. It sought to understand and rate the researcher/s’ congruence between their: stated philosophical perspective and methodology; conceptualisation of transitions and methodology; theorisation of transitions and methodology; and the overall quality and rigour of the research. The literature review covered the period 2008–2021. A review of reviews ascertained that no previous studies focused on either the congruence between researcher/s’ philosophical stance nor their theorisation of transitions with research methodology. Only one review briefly noted the importance of the congruence between transitions conceptualisation and methodology. Therefore, this review is unique in its purpose and internationally significant.
Five data bases were searched applying specific inclusion criteria (e.g., peer reviewed empirical papers, international, covering the period 2008–2021) resulting in 151 papers. A rigorous and systematic approach was adopted throughout all stages of the research process (searching, screening, describing and mapping, and quality appraisal). 74 papers were cross-checked for quality assurance purposes. A self-developed assessment framework was used in the first phase of analysis. The next phase involved the use of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to assess methodological quality.
Findings indicate that approximately 91% of papers did not state their philosophical perspective. Two thirds of researchers did not provide their conceptualisation of transitions and 59% failed to provide their theoretical perspective. Those studies which offered their conceptualisation and theorisation of transitions were of a higher quality than those which only indicated their conceptualisation or theorisation of transitions.
These findings have implications for researchers to state their conceptualisation and theorisation of transitions. Policy makers and practitioners should be aware of how they understand and action primary-secondary transitions research. As such, this paper provides a unique insight and makes an original and significant contribution to the field.
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms. If a submission is rejected or withdrawn prior to publication, all rights return to the author(s):- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Submitting to the journal implicitly confirms that all named authors and rights holders have agreed to the above terms of publication. It is the submitting author's responsibility to ensure all authors and relevant institutional bodies have given their agreement at the point of submission.
Note: some institutions require authors to seek written approval in relation to the terms of publication. Should this be required, authors can request a separate licence agreement document from the editorial team (e.g. authors who are Crown employees).
